profile
viewpoint
If you are wondering where the data of this site comes from, please visit https://api.github.com/users/carlosdauden/events. GitMemory does not store any data, but only uses NGINX to cache data for a period of time. The idea behind GitMemory is simply to give users a better reading experience.

carlosdauden/account-invoicing 0

Odoo Invoicing Extension Addons

carlosdauden/bank-statement-import 0

Bank Import Addons

carlosdauden/maintainer-tools 0

Odoo Maintainers Tools for OCA members which evaluate and maintain repositories.

carlosdauden/odoo 0

Odoo. Open Source Apps To Grow Your Business.

carlosdauden/odoomrp-wip 0

WIP of OdooMRP

carlosdauden/stock-logistics-workflow 0

Odoo Stock, Workflow and Organization

carlosdauden/StockControl 0

REELS CONTROL ============= * **Stock Sync**

push eventTecnativa/account-invoicing

Carlos Dauden

commit sha 74f7b4ea4b75648b9bb3964393a9657100485ffd

[ADD] account_invoice_picking_date_check: Add new module TT31195

view details

push time in a day

PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent

issue closedOCA/mis-builder

[13.0][14.0] mis_builder : Don't supports concurrent multicompany selection

This domain prevents the selection of several companies according to the use of concurrent multicompany implemented as of v13: https://github.com/OCA/mis-builder/blob/bfa6677b57491156cbb8c6d1cc16b972fed01f36/mis_builder/views/mis_report_instance.xml#L175 Simply change... ¿Can be removed this domain?

More ambitious change...

Given the new scenario, can we consider keeping only one of the fields company (query_company_ids) and remove others (company_id and company_ids)? https://github.com/OCA/mis-builder/blob/bfa6677b57491156cbb8c6d1cc16b972fed01f36/mis_builder/models/mis_report_instance.py#L590-L596 https://github.com/OCA/mis-builder/blob/bfa6677b57491156cbb8c6d1cc16b972fed01f36/mis_builder/models/mis_report_instance.py#L580-L588

closed time in 3 days

carlosdauden

issue commentOCA/mis-builder

[13.0][14.0] mis_builder : Don't supports concurrent multicompany selection

Improved in https://github.com/OCA/mis-builder/pull/374

carlosdauden

comment created time in 3 days

PullRequestReviewEvent

push eventTecnativa/purchase-workflow

Víctor Martínez

commit sha 47644dffb50d2b8517d2bb7ef4143ce63be0b465

[IMP] purchase_last_price_info: Add last_purchase_currency and last_purchase_price_currency in products. Refactor code: Now used last_purchase_line_id field and is auto-set wit all info. When adding new purchase order lines last_purchase_line_ids field will be used to re-compute last_purchase_line_id field and change all information.

view details

OCA-git-bot

commit sha 03ab665e5a3b23f5d9d5f1388c1d1b7e2c24aebc

Merge PR #1235 into 13.0 Signed-off-by pedrobaeza

view details

oca-travis

commit sha 5df0e2874944c55446c94eaa0fdadefe81e0c8ef

[UPD] Update purchase_last_price_info.pot

view details

OCA-git-bot

commit sha 20f051cda2239025100043093e7b43eabefe0785

[UPD] README.rst

view details

OCA-git-bot

commit sha 6bb1a04062bb97d5a0fd435b3f1b26718f0d7cab

purchase_last_price_info 13.0.2.0.0

view details

OCA-git-bot

commit sha 8e2288a4eb5bf85ba9e1884202178ca6d574f732

[UPD] addons table in README.md

view details

OCA Transbot

commit sha 79769ea558be7a96cdb9ec21fcc4d8025ff7658c

Update translation files Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: purchase-workflow-13.0/purchase-workflow-13.0-purchase_last_price_info Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/purchase-workflow-13-0/purchase-workflow-13-0-purchase_last_price_info/

view details

Ernesto Tejeda

commit sha f042bb765be9cbd64abcb320236e8e0d2ecbc824

[ADD] purchase_order_supplierinfo_update: new module

view details

push time in 5 days

PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent

push eventTecnativa/stock-logistics-workflow

Carlos Dauden

commit sha bd0ba23431564b3327497b01362296266f18342b

[ADD] stock_deferred_assign: Add new module TT31143

view details

push time in 8 days

Pull request review commentOCA/purchase-workflow

[13.0][ADD] purchase_order_supplierinfo_update: new module

+# Copyright 2021 Tecnativa - Ernesto Tejeda+# License AGPL-3.0 or later (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).++from odoo import api, models+++class PurchaseOrder(models.Model):+    _inherit = "purchase.order"++    def write(self, vals):

Why don't extend button_approve instead of write: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/d9ff2e8ec7200aa15830e92e5083251c4e81dd1c/addons/purchase/models/purchase.py#L349

What happen when the user clicks in Lock button in an approved PO? I think that unnecesary update_supplierinfo_prince will be called.

ernestotejeda

comment created time in 8 days

PullRequestReviewEvent

push eventTecnativa/stock-logistics-workflow

Carlos Dauden

commit sha 98156f8db7a259b416e8ac1f421013726a4b0fd3

[ADD] stock_deferred_assign: Add new module TT31143

view details

push time in 8 days

PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent
CommitCommentEvent

issue closedodoo/odoo

[13.0] account: Overwrite render_qweb_pdf breaks the heritability

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4c06b3c1180048b1c0db5067adf0c0bef5c02785/addons/account/models/ir_actions_report.py#L47 This code breaks the heritability... May be data=data: return super().render_qweb_pdf(res_ids=res_ids, data=data)

closed time in 9 days

carlosdauden

issue commentodoo/odoo

[13.0] account: Overwrite render_qweb_pdf breaks the heritability

Fixed https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/76696

carlosdauden

comment created time in 9 days

issue openedodoo/odoo

[13.0] account: Overwrite render_qweb_pdf breaks the heritability

https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/4c06b3c1180048b1c0db5067adf0c0bef5c02785/addons/account/models/ir_actions_report.py#L47 This code breaks the heritability... May be data=data: return super().render_qweb_pdf(res_ids=res_ids, data=data)

created time in 9 days

CommitCommentEvent

Pull request review commentOCA/stock-logistics-warehouse

[IMP] stock_lot_filter_available: Add more conditions to avoid errors

 class StockProductionLot(models.Model):      @api.model     def _is_unsupported_search_operator(self, operator):-        return operator != ">"+        return operator not in ["=", "!=", ">", ">=", "<", "<="] -    def _search_product_qty(self, operator, value):+    def _search_product_qty(self, op, value):         if self._is_unsupported_search_operator(operator) or value:

You can define operator_mapping at this point and check if operator is in dictionary to avoid keep _is_unsupported_search_operator method

CarlosRoca13

comment created time in 9 days

PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent
PullRequestReviewEvent